🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has declared it is pursuing damages amounting to $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This action constitutes a clear warning by the Kremlin regarding plans to utilize immobilized Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine.

The Substantial Demand

Based on accounts in Russian state media, the central bank filed a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure corresponds to the stated $230 billion claim.

European Union officials are set to determine in the coming days on a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in immobilized Russian state funds. This scheme entails granting Ukraine with a large loan to fund its military and economic stability.

Most of these assets, totaling €185 billion, are stored at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the main keeper for the Kremlin's immobilised sovereign wealth.

Divergent Legal Views

European Union authorities have maintained that their proposal is on solid legal ground. They argue is based on the principle that ownership of the state assets still belongs to Russia, despite being it was immobilized in European countries following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

The Russian government, in contrast, has called any utilization of the funds as theft. Authorities have threatened retaliatory actions, such as confiscating EU corporate assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a prominent role in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He warned that the EU, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the proposal.

Strategic Positioning

In comments seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, the official described the proposal as "a severe attack on property rights and the global financial system established by the United States."

The clearing house declined to provide a statement on the latest legal action. It has in the past stated it is contending with over 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.

Enforcement Challenges

Although courts in European nations are not expected to enforce judgments from Russian courts, experts anticipate Moscow to seek enforcement in countries with stronger relations to the Kremlin.

"Russian monetary authorities may attempt to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in countries such as China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, if relevant assets can be located," commented a lawyer from an international firm.

European Safeguards

EU officials said they are developing measures to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian legal action against EU companies. They are also crafting protections to protect EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "illegal expropriation."

How the Funding Would Work

Under the complex plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the frozen assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.

Kyiv would solely be obligated to return the loan if and when Russia agreed to pay reparations for the immense destruction caused during the nearly four-year war.

Other Funding Ideas

The Belgian government, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unallocated funds within the EU budget.

This alternative move, nevertheless, demands full agreement among all 27 EU countries. The Hungarian government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its objection.

Commenting on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, said the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible solution" for supporting Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, meaning it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is also important," she remarked. "It also delivers a clear message that if you cause all this destruction to another country, you must pay for the reparations."